Former CNMI House representative Andrew Salas sued for the reversal of the ban and called cockfighting an important cultural and political activity throughout the islands that had been wrongfully prohibited. Photo: 123RF/Derweduwen Marrcel
The US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit has affirmed the cockfighting ban in the Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI).
"Congress is not precluded from passing legislation affecting the internal affairs of the CNMI. Rather, a court must 'balance the federal interest to be served by the legislation at issue against the degree of intrusion into the internal affairs of the CNMI'," US Circuit Judge Lucy Koh wrote in the ruling.
Koh said the federal government's interests in animal welfare and controlling the spread of avian flu outweighs any degree of intrusion into the territory's internal affairs.
The 1966 Animal Welfare Act was amended in 1976 to ban interstate commerce involving animal fights, so the act is still applicable to the territory under the 1978 covenant, she wrote.
Former CNMI House representative Andrew Salas sued for the reversal of the ban and called cockfighting an important cultural and political activity throughout the islands that had been wrongfully prohibited by the Agriculture Improvement Act and goes against the covenant that allows the territory a unique level of self-governance.
Part of the Agriculture Improvement Act, however, banned all forms of animal fighting throughout the 50 states and its territories in 2018.
As cockfighting had already been outlawed in all states by 2008, Salas said the act targeted the territories.
A federal judge dismissed the case in November 2022, finding federal interests in animal welfare and interstate commerce outweighed intrusion on the commonwealth's internal affairs. Salas then appealed to the Ninth Circuit.
"The court's ruling is obviously a disappointment, but here in the CNMI we've known for a long time that the defence of our right to self-government is a long, rough road, so in that sense it isn't really a surprise," Salas' attorney Joseph Horey said.
'Thorough and well-reasoned'
The Commonwealth's self-governance was a concern for US Circuit Judge Richard Paez, who ultimately concurred with the other judges that the ban on cockfighting does not intrude on the internal affairs of the territory, but disagreed with the application of the section of the covenant they used in the ruling.
One of the guiding principles of the covenant is the right to self-governance, Paez said, and by using a different section in the ruling, it allowed some legislation to "escape the reach of" a section of the covenant that determines the applicability of laws enacted after 9 January 1978.
In this case, Paez said he would interpret any ambiguity in the covenant "in favor of the CNMI and its people," and "ensure that its provisions "reaches all federal 'legislation,' including subsequent amendments to laws in existence on January 9, 1978" which would further protect the right to self-governance.
"To close, when the United States and the people of the Northern Mariana Islands came together to ratify the covenant, they enshrined in that document the CNMI's fundamental right to self-government," Paez wrote.
"We are faced here with the question of just how committed we are to upholding that promise," Paez wrote.
However, Paez still found that Salas failed to demonstrate that the Animal Welfare Act and the 2018 ban on cockfighting intruded on the affairs of the Northern Mariana Islands.
The 9th Circuit panel was rounded out by US Circuit Judge Milan Smith Jr.
"Although Judge Paez's concurrence also came to the wrong conclusion in the end, his analysis is thorough and well-reasoned most of the way, and it encourages us to consider seeking en banc review," Horey said.
Salas had also argued that the Animal Welfare Act should have also exempted Guam, another US territory, from the law's prohibition on cockfighting, and that the 2018 amendment to the law was motivated by Congress' subjective moral objections to the practice. Koh disagreed that the law was not applicable to Guam and therefore not applicable to the commonwealth.
Because Guam as a US territory falls under the definition of a "state," Koh wrote, "a statute that references the United States and its territories and possessions is a strong indication that it is meant to apply in the CNMI."
She also added that past precedent had already established the ban was also legal in Guam.
In 2020, a federal court in Guam denied a man's motion seeking an injunction to prevent the government from enforcing a ban on cockfighting, finding that "nowhere in the 'Bill of Rights' does it give plaintiffs the right to cockfighting."
In 2021, the 9th Circuit affirmed the lower court's ruling.