Air rifles are often considered beginner's - or children's - guns. Photo: 123RF
Two surgeons are calling for more airgun restrictions after research that saw them use air rifles to shoot pig carcasses.
In a paper published today in the New Zealand Medical Journal, surgeons Ben Black and Kevin Peek said they were shocked at how easily the shots deeply penetrated the chest walls of the pigs.
The study was prompted by treating people who had almost died from shots to the chest from air rifles, which can be sold to anyone aged over 18 without any background checks or license.
In the experiment, they fired a .22-callibre spring-loaded airgun into the left-hand chest walls of the "porcine cadavers", which had been ethically obtained from the University of Auckland.
They then performed an autopsy.
Out of 10 shots, six would have been lethal or potentially lethal, with nine of them penetrating the chest wall to an average of 10.6cm.
Black said the extent of the damage was surprising.
"We were the same as most people in thinking, 'Air rifles - they're the kind of weapon that kids use to clink cans in the back yard.'
"But these contemporary weapons [are] very much able to cause a lethal injury at five or 10 metres," he said.
Many airguns were more like small-bore rifles, the researchers said. They hoped the medical journal paper could help argue the case for tighter restrictions on their sale.
Black said both the surgeons had encountered dangerous and deliberate air rifle injuries at work.
In one instance, heart surgery was needed in the emergency department; in another, a pellet had entered the chest and passed through a patient's lung.
"These are patients that very nearly died or would have died without urgent medical intervention," he said.
In separate research, not yet published, the surgeons examined 10 years of gun trauma at Auckland Hospital.
A third of the injuries were caused by air rifles - many of which had been fired deliberately, Black said.
In the 1980s and 1990s nearly all such injuries were accidental.
Two very high-powered types of airgun required a license in New Zealand, but not the spring-loaded variety used by the researchers.
Black said many similar countries restricted the sale of air rifles based on how fast the pellets went, but in New Zealand it was based on the type of mechanism. This meant although the rifles had become more powerful, they still did not require a license.
In their paper, the pair said the voice of medical workers was often absent in rules to prevent trauma and harm.
"Our study adds some medical validity to the opinion that these higher-velocity air weapons should be considered more like a small-bore rifle in terms of the lethality," they said.