A new OECD report suggests some video-gaming is better than no video-gaming when it comes to teenagers' academic performance, but it depends what they are playing, Radio New Zealand reports.
The report, The ABC of Gender Equality in Education, says that students who play collaborative video games score about 20 points worse on reading, maths and science tests than those who do not play them, a difference equivalent to about six-months schooling.
But those who play single-player games score as much as 35 points better than those who do not, especially if they are not playing those games every day.
The reports also looks at why boys are more likely to be poor performers than girls, especially in reading, and why girls are less likely to be among the top students in maths and science. New Zealand's performance in the tests has been falling, and twice as many boys as girls are classified as poor readers.
The report says boys are more likely to be overall low achievers than girls for a variety of reasons which include:
- Boys are more likely than girls to play video games.
- Boys are more likely than girls to spend time on computers and the Internet.
- Boys are less likely than girls to read outside of school for enjoyment.
- Boys are less likely than girls to enjoy activities connected with reading.
- Boys are less likely than girls to do homework.
- Boys are more likely than girls to have negative attitudes towards school.
- Boys are more likely than girls to arrive late for school.
- Boys are less likely than girls to engage in school-related work out of intrinsic motivation.