West Coast landowners wrongly advised they had 'sites and areas of significance to Māori' on their properties will shortly get confirmation they are not affected.
West Coast town of Kumara. File photo. Photo: Wikipedia Creative Commons
The Te Tai o Poutini Plan (TTPP) Committee today voted to amend incorrect maps in the draft, and affected ratepayers will get new letters advising them of the revision.
Poutini Ngai Tahu pushed back after committee chairman Rex Williams suggested they were responsible for rectifying the changes promptly, "by the end of the week".
Both iwi representatives Francois Tumahai and Paul Madgwick took exception to that, saying the mapping mistakes were not the fault of Ngāi Tahu.
"What is another day or two to get it right?" Tumahai asked.
"We could end up in the same situation again and how bad would that look? We need it right ... there's no second chance over this."
The original identification of sites by Ngāi Tahu for the TTPP had been "bang on", Madgwick said.
"I don't want this problem apportioned to Ngāi Tahu. This is not our fault. The maps were bang on."
Councillor Laura Coll-McLaughlin suggested an extension to the 30 September public submissions period to ensure everyone had time to see the map changes.
Poutini Ngāi Tahu worked to identify 216 areas and sites of significance across the West Coast over more than two years, but when the digital maps were transferred over to the planning team, some were distorted.
The mistakes only emerged when TTPP letters were sent to landowners last month, pointing out sites of significance to Māori had been identified on their properties, with rules taking "immediate legal effect".
Kumara man Russell Spaan with a letter sent to him by the TTPP wrongly advising him his property had a site or area of significance to Māori. Photo: LDR / Brendon McMahon
It was news to some property owners, particularly at Kumara, near Gladstone and around Sawyers Creek in Greymouth.
"Unfortunately because of the speed which we were having to complete this [draft] work, there were some errors identified in the mapping," principal planner Lois Easton told the extraordinary plan committee meeting today.
The system used to transfer the original maps meant some areas were completely wrong.
"The information passed over from Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu has come over in our e-plans as different shapes. People have been identified under sites of significance to Māori which are not there," Easton said.
Legal advice was the mistakes and others could be dealt with by way of a "minor amendment".
This included heritage areas not "aligning" with the draft plan.
"That again is a minor amendment."
The distortion in the maps ranged from oval to ellipses, Easton said.
The meeting agreed to look at a possible extension for submissions at its 8 September meeting.
*Te Runanga o Makaawhio chairman Paul Madgwick is also the editor of the Greymouth Star. He took no part in the commissioning, writing or editing of this LDR story.
Local Democracy Reporting is Public interest journalism funded through NZ On Air